Subject: | Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak |
---|---|
From: | "Alan" <atk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 7 May 2002 13:25:18 -0000 |
For 120 print from Fuji I recommend Reala (rate it 80asa) and NPC for landscape. Reala is also good for environment port. I personally disklike NPS but others like it (it is also very grainy). Rather than NPS I'd go with NPH (rate it 300ish). NPH is very nice. I personally find that NPZ is too high contrast but others like it (rate it 640). It seems uniformly fuji films need to be over exposed a little for optimal results. The only thing I like about kodak is portra 160 VC for fireworks. Alan < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Quantum Turbo and Olympus flashes, Thomas Bryhn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Mushy foam, Timpe, Jim |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak, Pete Prunskunas |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak, ClassicVW |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |