Chuck Norcut wrote:
> Here's another vote for the Stylus Epic. (but make sure it's an Epic and
> not an ordinary Stylus which only has a 3.5 lens). This is a great
> "Point 'n Shoot" that will actually fit into a shirt pocket. It is
> diminutive even with respect to its Stylus zoom brethren. It's auto
> everything but actually allows a fair modicum of control when you need
> it. The spot metering and focus lock are easy to use. It's a great and
> reliable tool when loaded with some 200 print film.
I was in the local Kodak shop this afternoon, and saw some Portra 400VC
36exp. which was outdated by about 9 months. Made an offer on some of it,
and got a dozen rolls for what would work out to be about $1.75 US funds per
roll. I was thinking this might be good to send with him to Bolivia. What do
you all think? I am thinking it might still be as good as current dated
Kodak Gold 200 stuff.
> Pros: The front cover seals it up pretty well. I once dropped mine
> this past winter into a gutter that was filled 4" deep with ice cold
> melt water. It was submerged for about 5 seconds before I managed to
> retrieve it from a small whirlpool swirling around over the sewer
> grate. I thought for sure it was a goner but only a couple of drops of
> water managed to get behind the lens cover. No water got inside the
> camera. Dried it off with a paper towel and it's as good as new.
Nice test. <g>
Wayne
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|