Subject: | Re: [OM] 28mm f2.0 versus 28mm f2.8 |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 1 May 2002 09:05:07 -0400 |
Cc: | <deewhy_au@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Yep. Tom > In a message dated 5/1/2002 1:24:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > deewhy_au@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > > "Although I own a SC Zuiko 28 f2.8" > > <snip> > > I don't think there ever was an SC 28/2.8. Many (all?) of the 28/3.5's are > SC, but I'm pretty sure the 28/2.8 was MC when it was introduced. > > Paul Schings > > < < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Bargain on ebay in Switzerland, Timpe, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Sniping services WAS: Zuiko 50mm f1.2 cost?, Jim Couch |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28mm f2.0 versus 28mm f2.8, Pschings |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28mm f2.0 versus 28mm f2.8, frieder . faig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |