Well, don't want to sound like a heretic, but is it possible also that this
lens would be better than a Zuiko 40/2? I mean the Zuiko 40/2 is known to
be an OK but not a stellar performer?
FWIW, Yosemite was amazing, as usual. The photographer (me :-) ) though is
incompetent, so I don't know whether there are any good shots at all. I
ended up using EktaChrome 200. The 40mm perspective may be good, as I was
mainly using the 35/2, and sometimes it feels a bit wide for a general
purpose lens.
At 03:20 PM 4/19/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Interesting, but at that weight I might as well carry a 50/1.8.
I'll keep my 40/2....
Tom
...
// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|