> Seems most unlikely; the 80-200/2.8 is better than any similar range Zuiko
> zoom. Perhaps you are confusing it with an older 80-200 f4.5 or similar.
> the 80-200/f2.8 also costs about 8-10 times as much as an OM-10.......
I guess I am getting confused. I haven't used this lens for sometime now
so the details I can remember are a bit sketchy! The results it gave
weren't bad at all so I can't really give an excuse as to why I don't
use it that often!
Best Wishes,
Gareth.
Gareth.J.Martin,
Research Postgraduate,
School of Geographical Sciences,
University of Bristol,
University Road,
Bristol,
BS8 1SS.
g.j.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
attackwarningred@xxxxxxxxxxx
eclipsing.binary@xxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|