Hi Lama,
I also wondered whether it was taken with that lens. The perspective does not
look like that of a 50mm and the star-shaped highlights might indicate a lens
with about 10 diaphragm blades or so. Or can it be a filter effect? The 50/3.5
only has 6 blades.
Any comments?
Bernd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim L'Hommedieu" <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM Pic on Photo.net
> It doesn't look like the perspective of a 50mm lens at all, to me. Unless
> he cropped the hell out of it, it looks like a 135mm focal length or so.
> Note the long-lens compression in her cheeks. This is not a 'normal'
> perspective. That's my opinion. Others?
>
> Lama
> ----- Original Message -----
> Waterfall (nude located in Other photos: of the week | top-rated)
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=669162
> This picture re-instates how sharp the 50mm MACRO 3.5 really is.
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|