Hi C.H.Ling
I always check your work ;-) I have seen your test when you
reported it long time ago. Thank you for your coments.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Old Zuikos sharper than new Canon Zooms?
> A 4000dpi scanner is not a good way to said about the resolution quality
of
> a slide, a projector is a little better but also not the best way even you
> have a very good lens. The best way is to use a 20x loupe or a microscope,
I
> have a Olympus microscope which serve for that purpose.
>
> Check below link:
>
> http://www.glink.net.hk/~digicam/E10V35.htm
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <msparks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Johnny,
> >
> > Try projecting your slides to see if the results are comparable. I
think
> it's been shown that even a 4000 PPI scan won't *fully* resolve a 35mm
> slide. Plus, you may introduce other variables, like film flatness and
> scanner focus, that are bypassed when you project the original to a large
> enough size, focus precisely, and take a very close look. In my
experience
> even the best scans don't come close to the effect from a nice, big
> projection.
> >
> > Morgan
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|