Yup, there was Skip's FS image and I still wrote the wrong number. It's
67mm. That's big for a 28mm, but not all that big in general. Both the
18/3.5 and 300/4.5 take 72mm filters, my Tamron SP 80-200/2.8 is 77mm
and I have several lenses that take 62 and 67mm filters.
Charles Sdunek wrote:
It does have a huge front element, doesnt it? Fortunately, it came
with a tiffen polarizer on it... the most expensive filter I would
likely ever use. I think it's 67mm.
At 02:34 AM 4/6/02, Moose wrote:
That was my only wide angle for many years. I don't know how it would
stack up on a test, but I took some great slides with it. It's a
little outsized with that big front element and I never had a proper
shade for it, but I was careful and didn't have flare problems. And
how about that 72mm filter size?? My Zuiko 28/2 takes a 49mm filter.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|