ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?

from dreammoose

Subject:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?
From:	dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:42:20 -0800

Uh-oh Roger,

Two of us agreeing on a non-Zuiko solution could be trouble ;-)

Roger D. Key wrote:

I can also recommend my Tamron SP 35-105mm f2.8 (my personal choice).




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, (continued) Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Dave Dougherty RE: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Wayne Culberson Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Dave Dougherty RE: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, John A. Lind [OM] Ultra Rare OM-1/2 MD cover, M. Lloyd Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Roger D. Key Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose <= Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, ClassicVW Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, ClassicVW Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Andy Gilbert

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Arches National Park, Gary Edwards
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Roger D. Key
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Brian Swale
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]