Hi Wayne,
The thing is, you don't need a lot of shots to make a site worth visiting.
Just 6 photos would be worthwhile. The more you have the more work it is,
and the more visitor downloads cost, so there's a reason to keep it small.
For example, a site worth looking at, with just a few nice shots on one
theme, is Andrew Fildes' site in Australia, resulting from a very successful
visit to an aquarium.
Anyway, just a suggestion. If the html coding is a problem, just call.
Brian
Date sent: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 09:07:21 -0500
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Wayne Shumaker <shumaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] ADITL and TOPE Statistics - new event
Copies to: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> At 10:11 AM 4/5/2002 +1200, Brian wrote:
> >Hi Wayne
> ><snip>
> > A really nice shot; makes me all the more keen to get an 85.
> >
> >Why not put some of your best shots in an organised little gallery for
> >people
> >to look at (and me to list <g>)
>
> Yeah, I've been told by several people, including the one I live with,
> to get my stuff organized:-) Seems she would like a lot more of them
> framed. It takes a lot of work to really edit down one's photos. I'm
> rather critical of my own stuff. Sometimes I don't know when I have a
> good photo until someone points it out to me, or I've had a chance to
> look at it over time. But, to quote my friend, "It's the only way to know
> where your photography is going, what is the next step." Thanks for
> the praise.
>
> There are a lot of web hosting services out there now and I've been
> looking into them.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|