I recently took some of my favorites slides in for scanning. One of
them, a photo of some crotons in front of a window on a house in
Hawaii, was taken in 1984 at about 5:30 am with available light with
Kodachrome 64 (it was taken with a black nose, single coated 50 mm
f/1.8). I haven't uploaded a scan of this to my pbase gallery because
the scan just doesn't seem to do justice to the slide (not that any
of them do, but this one seems worse than the others in that
respect). Anyway, its a very nice still life shot that I have gotten
many positive comments on over the years. I was showing it to a
co-worker friend the other day who has recently bought a Canon EOS3
with two zoom lenses; one of them is a 28-70mm, I believe (?).
Anyway, when he viewed the slide the other day in the little Agfa
viewer, he was just knocked out at the sharpness of the photograph
and remarked that photos from his Canon lenses just don't look like
that (he has been shooting with Fuji Provia 100, I might add). I have
heard him make similar comments about these zooms before, but is this
possible? I would have thought that Canon's years of R&D and
resources in 20 years or greater would have resulted in superior
sharpness, but apparently not(?).
Just as a side note, I think he is getting interested in OM stuff, as
he told me the other day that there was an OM2-S "parts special" on
the eVILBay the other day, so he must have been looking at OM
equipment. I recently lent him my latest eBay aquisition, another
OM-1N body, and my standard 50 and the 28 mm f3.5 lenses to shoot
side by side with his Canon equipment. As he's a fellow scientist, it
should be an interesting comparison. Stay tuned....
-Stephen Scharf
--
2001 CBR600F4i - Fantastic!
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|