"John A. Lind" wrote:
>
> There's apparently some confusion about Superia 100 depending on where
> someone is (globally), how Fuji is marketing it, and how they update
> various regional sites.
>
Yes, I also hate their description on the negative, very hard to
identify the verison. Such as the old HR, HR2, SHR, SHG and now the
Superia... on the consumer film.
> "Superia 100" . . .
> An older 3-layer emulsion film and I believe the one C.H. Ling is writing
> about.
>
I don't know if they have changed the emulsion to 4-layer for the
ISO100 film yet (most likely yes), the consumer Superia with 4-layer
emulsion was start with the ISO400 and then the 200, finally the 100.
> "New Superia 100" . . .
> Has the same two letter designation as Superia 100, but a different data
> sheet, and has a 4-layer emulsion derived from Reala.
>
Yes, but I think they are still quite different from Reala, it scan
very differently, the Reala I tried was very warm and the Superia 200
and 400 (4-layer emulsion) was more neutral.
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|