At 7:09 AM -0500 4/1/02, ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote:
I do know that manufacturers are 'allowed' to be off by 10 0n their
claims for both f stop and zoom range. I notice that they always seem
to be off in the optimistic direction. You can see this by reading
the fine print in published lens tests. I never gave it much thought
if this was allowed as a 'normal' difference in manufacturing, or
what. I can't see it as that; could you imagine a lens that was
'allowed' to be100ff in focusing?!
I can. In fact, I've owned at least one such lens, and I bet you have too.
It's just that the definition of "off" in focusing is generally even less
harmful than it usually is for f-stop. The design of the mirror, body and
focussing screen guarantees (ahem) that when something looks in focus
through the viewfinder, it _is_ in focus on the film plane, so I
don't really care
what the distance scale says. And I've never believed that those
markings were particularly exact. (The only time I cared was with a
vivitar 19mm where the infinity stop corresponded to about 6', and
even allowing for hyperfocal distance that just didn't work.)
Same thing is mostly true for f-stop. 10 0ifference isn't going to
make or break any of your pictures. In fact, with TTL metering, you
don't really care what the aperture is (within reason); all you care
about is that each stop is half the aperture of the previous one.
(All this doesn't really excuse camera manufacturers, but it should
remind us what's important to making good pictures.)
paul
--
Paul Wallich pw@xxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|