And, Gary, the 50/3.5 I bought from you is still a mighty fine lens. . .
----- Original Message -----
From: <clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] which wide angle to get??
> You just can't help but rub salt in the wound, huh? ;^)
>
> (Listees, let this be a lesson to you -- never, ever, sell a good lens!
The
> buyer might end up on the list!)
>
> GFaulk7376@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 3/28/02 1:11:44 AM Central Standard Time,
> > clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >
> > > I keep the 24mm on-body and the 28mm in the bag as a back-up. The 28mm
> > > often just isn't _wide_ enough when I need >wide<.
> >
> > Hi Clint,
> > Your old 24F2.8 lens I purchased from you 10 or so years ago is still
one of
> > my sharpest lenses! Thanks!
> >
> > Gary Faulkenberry
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|