For seismic mass, I keep my Soligor 70-220/3.5 around. Weighs about three
and a half tons...
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Dougherty [mailto:davdou@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:02 AM
To: OLYMPUS
Subject: [OM] Re: Small Zooms
As regards the 35-70/3.6, I don't find the weight objectional. One of the
factors regarding weight that we seem to overlook in these threads is the
stability one gets with a slightly heavier lens, camera combination.
I thinks the superior optical performance of the 3.6 outweighs the little
extra weight involved. Just my 2 cents worth.
Dave Dougherty
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|