ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OT Art - was

Subject:	Re: [OM] OT Art - was - TOPE: Landscapes
From:	Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:55:14 +1100




> Charles Loeven <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The work is usually good on its own and it does not need a snob to
> explain
> it.

My take is:

If it needs a lot of words to explain it, then the artwork (painting, 
photograph, 
whatever) has failed miserably.


Wayne Harridge

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OT Art - was - TOPE: Landscapes, Wayne Harridge <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Landscapes or a lack thereof, John A. Lind
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] TOPE: Landscapes, Tris Schuler
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] DFW meeting of the minds, Wayne Harridge
Next by Thread:	[OM] Bounce Grip 1 & QA310 Question, Larry
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT Art - was - TOPE: Landscapes