Somehow just managed to press 'send' entirely by accident - here's all
of what I was trying to say.
Until today I thought I had it all worked out and knew what a landscape
was - now I'm not so sure!
To me, landscape means geography, and landscape photos (which I think is
what almost all my photos are) would definitely include coastlines,
rivers, icebergs, etc etc, which it seems some of you might exclude. A
cityscape can't be a landscape because it's man-made. However, man-made
objects don't, I think, preclude a shot from being a landscape.
So, for example, I'd consider this shot of a river to be a landscape
shot:
http://www.worldtraveller.f9.co.uk/photo/photos/hellasunset.jpg
But I'd consider this shot of a river to be a cityscape, and definitely
not a landscape:
http://www.worldtraveller.f9.co.uk/photo/photos/paris.jpg
These two shots are in the grey area, but I'd still call them landscapes
http://www.worldtraveller.f9.co.uk/travel/zambia-malawi/photos/006.jpg
http://www.worldtraveller.f9.co.uk/photo/photos/hadrianswall.jpg
And here's one in the grey area that I'd call a cityscape:
http://www.worldtraveller.f9.co.uk/travel/australia/2001/photos/sydney/au03-s03-22.jpg
One thing I'm sure of - a 'scape of any sort must be focussed at
infinity. Anyone agree?
Roger
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
