I have one coming attached to an OM2000. I've always been curious about
both and at $150 for the pair, I thought I couldn't lose. Glad to hear
you like yours.
Moose
Daniel J. Mitchell wrote:
35-70/3.5-4.5 - Not quite as good optically as the f3/6, but 2/3 the
length, half the weight and focuses closer than the f3.6.
Having finally acquired one of these, I _like_ it. It's tiny -- mounted, it
fits in a neverready case
fine, which is pretty impressive -- the light weight is a definite bonus,
and while I've not tried the 3.6 equivalent, I've taken generic snapshots
with the 3.5-4.5 that have made me say 'ooh, that's _sharp_' which I
certainly wasn't expecting.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|