Many of my favorite shots have been with the 75-150. In fact I purchased
another one last year, the orginal (I have had since 78) had suffered
from many a hard day in the hills and was pretty much dead. (The only
Zuiko I have ever killed.) I think it is a very underated lens.
Jim Couch
Damon Wood wrote:
> The popular 75 - 150 f4 used to sit in my OM lens pouch for quite a
> while.
>
> I had the ideology that slower lenses arent as sharp as the faster
> ones. Well, from the results Ive gotten back, I am refusing to accept
> it.
>
> Sure, quality may be lost in a zoom, but I have been and are
> continually suprised by the quality of this lens, especially
> considering it is only single coated. Id like to see the results if it
> where MC.
>
> Previously, the MC 135 2.8 was the one for portraits, but I now only
> use both (the 75 - 150 included).
>
> Proud owner of a 75 - 150 f4 ZOOM.
>
> Any others out there that agree / disagree?
>
> Cheers again pples!
>
> Damo
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|