In a message dated 3/19/02 12:02:13 AM Central Standard Time,
royer007@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> I thought a 180/2.8 was supposed to go for greater
>
Mark, Most probably do if in nice condition, this one sounds more like a user
and I probably wouldn't pay a premium price for a user. This is not say I
would not have and use a user, because I have many, I would just want the
price I pay to reflect the condition of the lens. Mine, although a good deal
at $425, was not a Fang or representative of what a "normal" price might be.
To paraphrase from one of my favorite and soon to be discontinued TV shows,
"The price is out there." Bill Barber
|