On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Chris Waigl wrote:
> Le Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:12:45 +0100 (CET), T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> écrivit:
>
> >
> >I'm a non-smoker, so keep your cigars ;) However I was wondering if you
> >thought up a name for it yet? ;)
>
> Now that's an interesting suggestion. Cruel and neglectful
> as it may appear to youm I'm not in the habit of actually
> naming this kind of family members. I call them by numbers
> and epithets. This one will be "the sweet little 24mm(f/2,8)".
> I've also "the trusty 50mm(f/1,8)", "the no-one-wants-me
> 100mm(f/2,8)", "the great 90mm"
Okie, now you've got me upset and jealous at the same time. The 100/2.8 is
a nice lens - it (or should I say "he"? a peck of living in France is that
we get to use "he" or "she" about objects) deserves a better parent than
someone who doesn't want him. Of course, in comparison with the 90....
> and "Doro's 200mm" ...
Uhh? What's that? Or, rather, who's Doro? Let's see, a nickname for your
wife who's taken an interrest in tele-photo? ;) If not, then enlighten
me...
> and I'm
> still hoping to get "the razor-sharp 28mm(f/2)" one day <g>.
>
And then you'll stop - really. Then you'll not need nor want to adopt
another lens, right? You can control it....
Ohh...and hi to another member in France. Is it you who snapped that 180/2
for a record of 3000FF just before me the other day? (that was a *really*
upsetting experience...)
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|