> The only real cure is to do some serious editing, and as
> Barry says, flex the critique muscles.
I'm getting that impression, yup -- I suppose what I should do is take more
notes of which shots I like, and also which ones I _don't_ like, or some
sort of similar discipline at any rate.
> Here's a question
> for you: if you have 4-5 shots left on a 36 exposure, do you rattle
> them off to finish the roll, or do you say, wow, I have 5 more
> potential good shots left, and try to make each one a worthy shot?
What I tend to do here is try and take a variety of shots of the same
thing, so that I can see which ones worked out best in the end -- that way I
can get the new film started sooner, but also have something to think about
when I look at the prints.
I think one problem I have is that it takes a lot of mistakes to pound
things into my head -- I can look at prints and think "boy, that doesn't
look very good", but the number of times I have to do that before I stop
doing the same thing is embarrasingly large.
There's some sort of weird mental disconnect between the editing process I
do when looking at prints, and the editing process I do when taking shots;
if I could get the two closer together, I could probably save myself a lot
of wasted film.
-- dan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|