I'd second that. It fits the gap between the 50/1.8 and the 24/2.0
perfectly. 35/2.0 and 85/2.0 are among my favourites, part of the
"tag-along" kit ;)
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Peter Dixon wrote:
> Have to gently disagree with AG on this, I think the 35/2 is a great,
> and underated and hence undervalued lens
>
> Pete
>
> (off to polish his 35/2.......)
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|