OM CONTENT (almost)
To the subject of ballheads, I've never had one, always used the awkward
pan head that came on the tripods. This ultimate one is a 'little' out
of my price range. Any suggestions on what's the cheapest 'good' one, to
be used with 35mm only [read small light OM, no winder :-) ], for macro
work in the field. I'd like to start watching eb*y, or find a member who
wants to get rid of one.
Wayne
Just a thought--I'm no expert on macro work.
I think anyone could get by with most anything decent (read: steady) for
level shoots. However, macro "in the field" more or less implies, at some
juncture, something other than "level" work, and I doubt the wisdom of
buying into a cheap system with either a tripod or ballhead in mind. I
think you would want to look around, do some research, talk to
photographers who actually do this work a lot for themselves. My guess is
soon enough you'll find yourself right back at the high end of the gear
equation--that's certainly where my queries and my research brought me.
Sorry to be the messenger with bad news, and I hope I'm mistaken.
If you stick solely to a very light load (your OM-1 with 50mm macro, say) I
think a super lightweight ballhead might be enough no matter the angle you
position your gear in. Gitzo happens to sell a honey. I forget the
nomenclature but it should be easy to run down. Check B&H for initial
reference, as they used to sell this unit. Their prices on Gitzo stuff are
high, though. You can probably do better elsewhere. I did.
Tris
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|