Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?")

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?")
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:41:45 -0800
 >>So are you saying the "Holy Roman Empire" also does not have spot metering
and it is not automatic?  I don't get the connection between the Spotmatic
and the "Holy Roman Empire".  Can someone explain this riddle to me?

It was not holy, it was a political entity, a kingdom.  It was not
Roman, it was in the area of France and Germany.  It was an attempt
to create something trading on the prestige of the past, sort of like
Cosina calling its product a Voigtländer.
--
Winsor Crosby

Oh - low blow! Perhaps I ought to do a comparison of the CosVoigt 21/4 and
the Zuik 21/3.5 - might be embarassing.
Incidently, my understanding was that the Spotmatic did have spot metering
in the prototype but this was dropped for the final release on the grounds
that most consumers didn't want it and would want to pay the extra for it.
Automatic referred to the fact that the lens stopped down automatically,
unlike earlier pre-set lenses.
AndrewF


Andrew,

I was not commenting on the quality of the new Voigtlaender, just that Cosina uses the name to sell cameras. Your comparison test would be interesting though. Although I think that Leica rangefinder lenses without the handicap of retrofocus design tend to be better than their SLR lenses.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California

?

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz