ML Archiv: RE: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?")

Subject:	RE: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?")
From:	"Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:35:12 -0800

Some would quarrel with the statement that it wasn't automatic...

-----Original Message-----
From: M. Lloyd 

It's also true what you said as well, Dan :) . The
Holy Roman Empire didn't have spot metering nor was it
automatic either 

Mark Lloyd

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] thoughts on catalog photography, (continued) RE: [OM] thoughts on catalog photography, Jim Caldwell Re: [OM] Spending the bonus, W.Xato Re: [OM] Spending the bonus, dreammoose Re: [OM] Spending the bonus, AG Schnozz Re: [OM] Spending the bonus, mike m. Re: [OM] Spending the bonus, Gary Edwards Re: [OM] Spending the bonus, Charles Monroe Re: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?"), andrew fildes Re: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?"), Larry RE: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?"), Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?"), Timpe, Jim <=

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?"), Timpe, Jim
Next by Date:	[OM] email problems, Mike
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] [OT] Riddle (was "unlucky numbers?"), Timpe, Jim
Next by Thread:	[OM] email problems, Mike
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]