ML Archiv: Re: [OM] L-5

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] L-5

from Tris Schuler

Subject:	Re: [OM] L-5
From:	Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2002 14:40:00 -0800

Not surprised. I think they just see film as a point and shoot medium forpeople who are not capable of dealing with digital.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California


That's an interesting take! <g>

Tris


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] L-5, k.matsumoto Re: [OM] L-5, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] L-5, Tris Schuler <= RE: [OM] L-5, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] L-5, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] L-5, dolphans1 Re: [OM] L-5, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] L-5, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] L-5, Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] L-5, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] L-5, Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] L-5, Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] L-5, Pauls0627

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] The Great Bokehhh Debate, Tris Schuler
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Jacob Daniel and Autofocus, DAVDOU9211
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] L-5, Winsor Crosby
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] L-5, Wayne Harridge
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]