> But why just a 645? If you are going to go medium format, you
> might as
> well use that larger film for the short dimension, no?
I do like the 6x7 format, but size of the camera/lenses and the
lack of modern features minimizes the advantage.
Besides, I can get digital backs for 645 cameras. I really like
the idea of settling in on a single system camera that does it
all--providing larger negs for the darkroom and digital
capability without obsolecence.
Cost per shot of 645 is much better than 6x7 too. The
film/processing costs eat you alive. With 645 you can get
something like 30 shots on a roll of 220.
With our modern films, I am very pleased with 645 and find no
driving reason to go beyond it. 35mm is just a hair too small
though.
My wife has agreed to a new camera system as soon as we have
caught back up, financially. We're getting there. I just have
to stay disciplined and not want a new Jeep.
AG-Schnozz
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|