There are several anomalies on the survey for 35/2.8s, but the first one
that looks to clearly be MC is #251229
http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/mc-sc.survey
ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote:
dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx writes:
#3 is also singlecoated. It looks like the filter is off in the first
picture and it is a blacknose, but the "G.Zuiko" confirms that it is an
SC lens. If the price is right???
Hi Moose,
I know the "G.ZUIKO" indicates a SC version, but I thought that the
S/N- "197345" was high enough to be in MC territory...? But its only a
thought, I have no info on S/Ns....
George S.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|