Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-1 -- a different metering question |
---|---|
From: | Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:20:44 -0800 |
DanYou need to read "Pefect Exposure" by Roger Hicks and Frances Schultz. His research, reasoning and science will help you to work out that it is probably of little consequence... ;-).Chris In that case why bother reading it? Everything's fine already. <g> Tris < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] 100mm/2.8 lens hood, Roger D. Key |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Dumb film scanning problem, dreammoose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-1 -- a different metering question, Tom |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM-1 -- a different metering question, Daniel J. Mitchell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |