Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Don't need no stinking OM-2

Subject: RE: [OM] Don't need no stinking OM-2
From: jowilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:43:21 -0600
>===== Original Message From Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> =====
>I find that using the spot meter function is easier by itself.  I
>look at the shadow area and the highlight area and decide whether I
>want to stop down from the former or up from the latter.
>
>I agree with Bill Stanke on the retro business.  It is part of the
>charm of the little cameras that it does look deliciously 50s.

Hey Chris,
Agreed, but I don't think "little" is part of the retro thing.  I took a photo 
of a visitor a few months ago, a wee lady from Scotland, and she wanted to see 
the camera, an OM-2S with 50/1.8.  She said, "My, it's heavy, isn't it?"  This 
was not my expectation and I was disappointed. But every camera most people 
are familiar with is smaller and lighter than even an OM-G.  SLR=retro=BIG. 
No?

Joel W.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz