Yo,
on Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:11:34 -0500, Walt Wayman wrote:
> If a fellow has an OM-1n, an OM-3, an
>OM-4 (or three), and an OM-4Ti, is there any conceivable reason
>(except for the tragic compulsion of Zuikoholism that requires the
>acquisition of at least one of everything) to own an OM-2?
Sure - for instance that the 2(n) is the best camera Olympus ever
made.
MtFbwy,
Volkhart
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|