Subject: | Re: [OM] 35mm, f2 on eBay |
---|---|
From: | "Jon Wichman" <jwichman@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:48:45 -0600 |
Still got that email? I think I found something that covers it: "Seller posts misleading or inapproprate listing title". Have his email message, the item ID handy and, then use this link. http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetRNSWebFormShow&flag1=0&flag2=1&flag3=11&rcode=420100121000000&subjecttier1=Questionable+Content+on+eBay&subjecttier2=Listing+Violations+-+Proper+format%2C+content+and+categorization&Query=Inappropriate+Title+-+Seller+posts+misleading+or+inappropriate+listing+title ----- Original Message ----- From: Conrad Vogel To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:27 PM Subject: Re: [OM] 35mm, f2 on eBay I sent off an email to the seller and here was his response: Kevspy@xxxxxxx wrote: you suck he he. -Conrad Johnny Johnson wrote: Hi Folks, Remember the 35mm, f2.8 on eBay last week that was described as being an f2? Well, it didn't meet the reserve and has been re-listed as: <http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1325612272> Be careful out there! Later, Johnny |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Life for Zuikos, David Lee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Digital Day Coming-WAIT A SECOND!!!, Charles Loeven |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35mm, f2 on eBay, John Hermanson |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] 35mm, f2 on eBay, Scott Gomez |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |