ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure

Subject:	Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure
From:	Jim Couch <jamesbcouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:03:43 -0800

And will we get a sine wave when he leaves?

Jim Couch

"W. J. Liles" wrote:

> Shouldn't that be SINE off?  Just Secant the truth.
>
> Jerry


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, (continued) Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Larry Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, W. J. Liles Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Tom Scales Re: [OM] OT fingerlights, W. J. Liles Re: [OM] OT fingerlights, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OT fingerlights, W. J. Liles Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Tom Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, W. J. Liles Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Tom Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, W. J. Liles Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Jim Couch <= Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Tom Scales Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Charles Monroe Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Tom Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, John A. Lind Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, John A. Lind

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] okay I'm lost, Jim Couch
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] What to keep when the Digital Day comes, Jim Couch
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, W. J. Liles
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Tom Scales
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]