Subject: | Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better 4 |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:08:38 -0800 (PST) |
> Worst of all, I'll bet they didn't use an Ag-Schnozz lens on > that 4x5 view > camera either. All black. Can't have reflections, you know. AG __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Photos from Australia - long response, Roger Wesson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] (FS) 55mm f1.2 with dedicated hood, frankrad4 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better 4, John A. Lind |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better 4, Lars Haven |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |