Dave,
At 4:03 PM +0000 1/21/02, olympus-digest wrote:
>
>Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:48:20 EST
>From: DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better
>
>Back in the 50's I remember an article in HOTROD Magazine in which a Physicist
>"proved" beyone a mathematical doubt that it was impossible for a dragster to
>exceed 165mph in the quarter mile ...
Heavier than air flight is also impossible....
>My Christmas pictures were taken with a 4.1M Pixel camera and they rival
>anything I have been able to produce with film and pro processing; and I have
>gotten some damn fine results from film and pro processing.
>
>We have enlarged the photos to 8 x 10 and they are beautiful, sharp and rich
>in color.
>
>I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of a film scanner. Then I will have the
>best of both worlds. But to suggest that the latest generation of digital
>cameras produce results analagous to a throw away camera or worse is both ill
>informed and born of using a comparison unfair to both sides of the equation.
I don't get it. You have very nice equipment. What does your equipment have
to do with a comparison between two lowest-end cameras, one film, the other
digital?
Joe
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|