CH,
At 4:03 PM +0000 1/21/02, olympus-digest wrote:
>Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:41:02 +0800
>From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better
>
>If you ever try a E-10 or E-20 and output with Fuji Frontier you will
>totally change you mind, the tonal gradations is better than all
>traditional one hour lab with film (at least here for what I have seen
>for twenty years). In noise aspect, E-10 and 20 are not the best at
>this moment, you will be amazing on the grainless of Canon D30 and
>Fuji F1 Pro (haven't seen the D1X yet). What the digital lack at this
>moment is high resolution.
Could you tells us more about the technical specs of the Fuji Frontier? Number
of pixels, bit depth of the pixels, etc? This may be far more camera than the
little 2.1-megapixel P&S I mentioned.
Joe Gwinn
>Joe Gwinn wrote:
> >
> > A few weeks ago, there was a discussion of the relative merits of film
> > versus digital, with the metric of goodness being how large an enlargement
> > each format would support, and it appears that visual sharpness was the
> > issue.
> >
> > There is a bit more to it than that. Color (and grayscale) fidelity very
> > much depends on the dynamic range and intensity resolution of the recording
> > media. This is always true, regardless of the media, silicon CCD or
> > silver-based film.
[snip]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|