Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-3 |
---|---|
From: | Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:53:36 -0800 |
The 3Ti finish is anodized not painted? Damn, that MUST be gorgeous! Now I really want one! And to think that I resisted all these years. Of course I have never seen one in real life, I knew that was to be avoided! Jim Couch Mark Dapoz wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Winsor Crosby wrote: > > > Well, that explains its extra cost - good paint. > > It's not paint, it's some kind of an anodizing. The finish is just gorgeous, > I imagine the cost of producing it is significantly higher than the painted > covers. > -mark < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [[OM] Opinions on the utility of monopods?], Tom |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [[OM] Opinions on the utility of monopods?], Barry B. Bean |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3, Stephan VAN DEN ZEGEL |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |