Yes, minimal, which is why some don't realizie its HTML. The HTML situation is
only affecting the digest people, which doesn't decode any HTML, so they get a
page of code. AOL is the main offender, as it offers its subscribers no help.
("You'll never leave us, so why should we care if our email application affects
Others...")
Larry
Scott Gomez wrote:
> How weird. I've been watching these too, and all I have received have been
> (minimal) HTML, in Arial. I wonder why they come through differently for
> different people?
>
> ---
> Scott Gomez
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hermanson [mailto:omtech@xxxxxxxxx]
> Subject: Re: [OM] re:AOL 7.0 & Windows XP (Long)
>
> They've all been plain text.
> _________________________________
> John Hermanson
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] re:AOL 7.0 & Windows XP (Long)
>
> > In <3C3E1F79.BCEA5E78@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 01/10/02 at 06:10 PM,
> > Larry <Halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> >
> > >Its HTML.
> > >Larry
> >
> > >DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > >> Ok so I have upgraded to 7.0. I hope this email is in plain text. If
> > >> not will one of the list members let me know.
> >
> > Plain text here. What gives?
> >
> > les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|