Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?

Subject: Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?
From: "Bachofen" <mbachofen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:56:56 -0600
yeah should read 60mm X 45mm
M.E.Bachofen

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 1/11/02 at 8:51 AM Winsor Crosby wrote:

>>  > > I'm just curious, how much will I gain going from 35mm to 645
>>>  > format?  Will I notice the difference, or not really until I pass the
>>8x10
>>>  > threshold?
>>
>>Tacking on to your answer since I don't have the original...
>>
>>Simply figuring the size gives a mean of 1770% larger original image.
>>Not necessarily 1770% better but, with much _larger_ possiblilties.
>>
>>35mm =   24mm x  36mm
>>6x4.5 =   600mm x 450mm
>>
>
>Let me see. That would give you an 18 inch by 24 inch contact print.
>Cool. How big is the camera?
>--
>Winsor Crosby
>Long Beach, California
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz