Subject: | Re: [OM] 35mm vs. 6x7??? |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:39:09 -0800 |
> > Given the difference.. WOW! I'm curious, I understand field work, action> shots, etc.. BUT, why would someone use a 35mm in the studio then??6x4.5,> 6x6 or 6x7, just has such HUGE advantages it's not funny.. Ok, I'mdoing> the math here.. Well...price, for one thing.Not true. Mamiya RZ Pro kit's on evilbay are floating below $1500. That's cheaper than a N*kon F* and one or two lenses.. So I don't think that is true. Maybe the preception of price... And a brand new Mamiya 645E kit with normal lens which is somewhat simplified(non interchangeable eye level viewer) but takes the pro lenses is $1399 at B&H. Cheaper than a new OM4T with 50/1.2 by several hundred dollars. -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?, Donald MacDonald |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?, Winsor Crosby |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35mm vs. 6x7???, Thomas Heide Clausen |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35mm vs. 6x7???, Roger Wesson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |