Subject: | Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm? |
---|---|
From: | "Bachofen" <mbachofen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:55:46 -0600 |
Dave wrote: " . . . it will probably be 2 1/4 square for reasons beyond your question." Please Dave what are some of the reasons? I've a Mamiya back on my Graflex and it's 6X7. It's kind of hard to move to vertical, but I'm interested in other reasons. M.E.Bachofen < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?, Charles Loeven |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Slides, John A. Lind |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?, Charles Loeven |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?, Olympus |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |