Subject: | Re: [OM] 35/2.0 vs 24/2.8 |
---|---|
From: | Henrik Dahl <hdahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:18:51 +0100 |
My current lenses are the 24/2.8, the 50/1.8, and the 135/3.5 (all Zuiko). I find the three make a good set, though a 100 would make a better progression. Keep the 24mm and get an 85/2. 24-50-85-135 is a nice range. Henrik Dahl < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | : [OM] Digital camera downfalls -slightly OT, Andy Gilbert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 35/2.0 vs 24/2.8, Tom Scales |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35/2.0 vs 24/2.8, M. Royer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35/2.0 vs 24/2.8, Bachofen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |