Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Re: Digital v real photography - slightly OT and long

Subject: RE: [OM] Re: Digital v real photography - slightly OT and long
From: "Dave Shupe" <kc7iek@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 20:25:04 -0800
Tom

Would you say that the E-20 gives you an order of magnitude better than a
4040?

Cheers!

Dave Shupe
kc7iek@xxxxxxxxx

Latitude 47° 43' 1" North, Longitude 122° 6' 15" West

 -----Original Message-----
From:   owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tom Scales
Sent:   Friday, January 04, 2002 8:02 PM
To:     olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: [OM] Re: Digital v real photography - slightly OT and long

It's interesting the quality differences between a consumer digicam, even
one with 4megapixels and the E-10 (in my case the E-20).  The results of the
'pocket camera' are wonderful -- I'd put them against 35mm at 4x6 and 5x7
and close at 8x10.  The results of the E-20 are an order of magnitude
better. I don't know if it is the glass (it's nice glass:))  or what, but
wow.

I'm getting closer and closer to digital.

Tom
P.S. and, no, there won't be a firesale

From: "Motor Sport Visions Photography"
<thoughtful E-10 observations>
 Mike Veglia




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz