Subject: | Re: [OM] Archival photos especially family history |
---|---|
From: | Gregg Iverson <golftooter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 04 Jan 2002 21:25:15 -0500 |
Who was taking pictures of 140 year old relatives in shoe boxes? Do you
really have a clear idea of how they lived? :-)
Gregg A lot of what was written for the last digest, especially about photos with genealogical potential and archival need seem to me like a strong argument for including a healthy diet of Black & White in family photography. I have B&W (sepia) photos of ancestors here, 140 years old as far as I can tell. Will colour last that long.? Without those few shots we would be MUCH more lacking in information on what these ancestors of mine looked like and how they lived. Those photos tell so much. In shoe boxes. (Well, they were). Brian < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36/Polariod, Gregg Iverson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] exodus to digicams..., Motor Sport Visions Photography |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Archival photos especially family history, John A. Lind |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Archival photos especially family history, Brian Swale |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |