Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Re: 24-exp versus 36 exp debate.

Subject: RE: [OM] Re: 24-exp versus 36 exp debate.
From: Scott Gomez <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:09:14 -0800
Personally, I'd like to see 20 exp. rolls. Seems to me that used to be an
available length, but that could be a dead brain cell, now days. 36 is too
long. Even 24 is sometimes more than I want.

All that said, I often end up with 36s just because that's the only way to
get the film I want to use. It's really difficult for me to use up 36
exposures in a short time, though. I tend to be pretty miserly with my
shooting.

I hate pulling a roll, inexpensive or not. Offends my Scottish genes right
to the core.

---
Scott Gomez

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Swale [mailto:bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: [OM] Re: 24-exp versus 36 exp debate.

I would never cut short a roll of Kodachrome unless somebody was paying 
me to. It's too valuable - to me anyway.

Brian

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz