Frieder, Thanks for the test results. I resized all of
them and overlaid them onto the PhotoDo graphs for
kicks. It was like they were almost totally different
lens. Maybe there is more variability from lens to
lens than one would think. I used to have three 28/2.8
Zuikos and never liked any of them. I use my 28/2 now
but still not 100% happy.
Warren
--- frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I know there`s alredy been enough talk about
> photodo-MTF values.
> Because of the low score of ouer well regarded
> Zuiko 28mm F2,
> I want to share other MTF-test results of this lens
> with you.
> So I´ve scanned the tests, and made a new page on my
> website.
>
> If interested you might see the scans at this url:
>
>
http://studweb.studserv.uni-stuttgart.de/studweb/users/mas/mas12462/OM/MTF/Zuiko-2-28.html
>
> Does this work on new email-readers:
> <p><a
>
href="http://studweb.studserv.uni-stuttgart.de/studweb/users/mas/mas12462/OM/MTF/Zuiko-2-28.html";>Link
> to 28mm Test</a><p>
>
> Just to show that a test-result might depend on a
> lot of unknown impact.
>
> Frieder Faig
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|