Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Vignetting, light pollution or both?

Subject: RE: [OM] Vignetting, light pollution or both?
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 10:18:28 -0800
John wrote:

 I vote for "cos^4 fall-off;" all lenses have some of this fall-off in the
 corners.  The shorter the lens the more pronounced the effect; the wider
 the aperture the more pronounced the effect; and the some lens
 designs show
 it more than others.  "Vignetting" is a misnomer for the effect; it is
 caused by light being spread out across a larger area of film in the
 corners than near the middle.  In addition, edge ray paths in the corners
 travel through more glass subjecting them to greater absorption
 rates, and
 can see the aperture at an angle making it effectively smaller (design
 dependent).  Stopping down the lens cuts off edge ray paths and
 reduces the
 effect. You probably have some light pollution and/or ground haze, but it
 appears to be second-order.  It can amplify the falloff effect,
 especially
 in the upper corners.

Strange that this effect is not more noticable in "normal" daylight shots,
especially with a lens like the 50mm f1.4.


Wayne Harridge
Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge/

Exactly. One expects that effect, but its variability would indicate that it is not the only explanation for darkened corners. Otherwise you would not have lenses of the same focal length and angle where it is pronounced like the 24/2 or less so like the 24/2.8.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz