Yo,
on Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:33:49 -0800, Winsor Crosby wrote:
All true, but the Stylus includes an electronic flash and a motorized
winder. If you add those to the other cameras the difference is
dramatic.
I think so does the Minolta.
Anyway, I've never been really happy with the Stylus product family. I
had a Stylus and a Stylus Zoom for a while, and I presently have an
Epic. True, it is ideal for carrying in a shirt pocket, and it does
take decent shots in many situations, so it has its uses in my
photography, but my XAs beat all of the above-mentioned Styluses hands
down when it comes to picture quality and control. The shots just look
way better, very very close to an SLR with a decent lens. I've had
some of them blown up to 60x40 without any problems; I wouldn't dream
of doing this with any Stylus shots. I also find it quite annoying
that the Epic, when used for available darkness, often exposes the
pictures (or at least tries to) until they have an overall brightness
like regular daylight shots, without any way for the photographer to
control this (unless you use spot metering and find a spot with the
right brightness in your composition). The XA handles this way better,
even allowing bracketting via the ASA selector. Another gripe I have
is that the Epic always switches the flash back on when I re-open it
after having put it in my pocket between two shots. Why can't it just
assume I had a reason to set it the way I did before closing it and
remember and reproduce this setting when re-opened?
So yes, if you need flash the Epic is considerably smaller, but to me
the XA is a vastly superior camera, giving me almost OM-functionality
and SLR-Zuiko-quality (no wonder - its lens _is_ a Zuiko, as opposed
to the Epic's).
MtFbwy,
Volkhart
That is interesting and the first negative remarks I have read for
the Epic Stylus. I have no experience with it or other P&S cameras.
I have thought that it would be nice to have a small, pocketable
camera which would be usable in most situations when I am not
carrying my camera bag which would have to include an easy to use
flash. I thought about the XA because of the rangefinder and other
possibilities for manual over ride, but it gets pretty bulky with the
flash enough has been said about the dark corners to make me shy
away. On the other hand there has been universal praise for the
sharpness and clarity of the Epic 2.8 lens. Is there another decent
alternative for a small, controllable high quality camera with an
easy flash?
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|