t's not properly described somehow. For an 8" diameter, it should be f2.3,
or the focal length must be ~900mm
Tom
On Thursday, December 20, 2001 at 10:59, Timpe, Jim
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "RE: [OM] Something different - 450mm" saying:
> I agree with his 'rare' and 'exotic' descriptions, but a 1500 minimum to
> even play is a little much IMHO.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Keller [mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:57 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Something different - 450mm
>
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1311337779
>
> For those of you needing something a little more unique.
> -jeff
------- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur -----------------
,__@ Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633
fax:231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa Ont. Canada K1R
7V8
(*)/'(*) ICQ:57647974 Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx N45.412
W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which,
if anything small falls into them they ensnare it,
but large things break through and escape.
--Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|